How does this actually work?
You give it text (or a URL). It runs ten statistical checks on the whole document and eighteen checks on each individual sentence. Then it tells you what percentage looks like AI wrote it and what percentage looks human.
No neural networks, no cloud APIs, no model downloads. Just math running in your browser. The whole thing takes milliseconds.
Why bother detecting AI content?
If you're a teacher checking student work, an editor reviewing submissions, or a marketer auditing your blog, you probably want to know whether the text in front of you was actually written by a person. Not because AI text is inherently bad, but because knowing the source matters for trust.
Most detection services charge per scan and require uploading your text to their servers. This one is free and your text never leaves your computer.
What makes a good detection signal?
Zipf's law conformity is the strongest single signal we found. Word frequencies in human text are messy; in AI text they follow a near-perfect mathematical curve. Repeated sentence starters is embarrassingly simple but effective: AI loves starting sentences with 'The' and 'This' over and over.
At the sentence level, the detector looks for things like dash overuse (AI loves em dashes), transition words that no human actually says out loud ('furthermore', 'moreover'), and the classic bold-title-then-explanation pattern that ChatGPT defaults to.
What it gets wrong
Corporate press releases and legal text can look like AI even when they're not, because they're formulaic by nature. Very short texts (under 200 words) don't have enough data for the metrics to be reliable. And if someone generates text with AI and then edits a third of it by hand, every detector on the market will struggle with that.
Treat the result as a signal, not a verdict. If it says 60% AI, that means 'worth a closer look', not 'definitely a robot wrote this'.





